So you’re writing a blog post?
Writing for the internet is not like writing a novel. Seriously, they’re galaxies apart. Writing an essay and writing a blog post aren’t galaxies apart; more like the distance between the nearest open cluster of stars and me.
Clearly, I’m referring to non-fiction here, rather than fiction or poetry or experimental writing. I’m not talking about writers who are using blogging tools to serialise their novels or continue to ‘journal’ blog (the origins of the internet weblog) because journalling is different – a more intimate form and less reliant on other people’s input and interactivity.
Much has been said of late – what with the Miscellaneous Voices launch, Jessica Au’s post at Spike last week about where blogging is at as a literary form, and the recognition writers (a category in which I include bloggers because they write) receive – about the nature, purpose and style of blogging. And while that is all worthy of debate, this is more a question of how to write for the digital medium.
Jessica Au asks:
Surely the more pressing question then is not whether poetry works better on print or as a digital text, but how it can work best according to the medium chosen?
Indeed. How are we negotiating the environment that is the internet? When we sit down to write a blog post, should we approach it in the same way as writing an essay – i.e. an essay with hyperlinks? An online writer can work with whatever style and content they prefer, but are they thinking about their medium and audience when they sit down to write – and are they adapting?
Nigel Featherstone reassuringly advises that there are 112,000,000 blogs currently operating in the world. ‘If my maths is right, and it’s often not, every fiftieth person around the globe is blogging.’ (That is a startling statistic.)
So what is blogging?
Technically, this isn’t what the post is about but it’s a bit hard to avoid a definition. So here it goes.
Originally blogs were seen as regularly updated content with an immediate currency. This is still true, to a degree, but let us pause to reflect on Nigel’s stat – how many of those 112,000,000 blogs are dedicated to reviewing, writing or journalling? Presumably a lot, but millions are also dedicated to news and commentary. Readers are now sifting through these blogs and sites for information used to interpret the world around them. Or as this video puts it, ‘blogs make the news a two-way street’:
Writing for the internet is structurally and functionally different to writing for print. It does not necessarily rely on the linearity of the printed page, and the beauty of the internet is that it’s interactive and dynamic – something that many commentators and bloggers seem to have lost sight of in recent debates.
Jessica’s post asks why these ‘bells and whistles’ and ‘digital noise’ factors aren’t considered part of the form? I contend that they are essential to writing for the digital medium, and have compiled a list of other tips to assist with the blogging process.
Thinking of audience
This is one of the most important considerations when writing anything, but I think we often forget how hard it is to cultivate an audience on the internet and how to keep them once they’re there. (There are 112,000,000 other blogs these people could be reading.)
And people read differently onscreen. Readers are less willing to give their undivided attention to the computer monitor, hence the arguments about long form. (Is this because the online environment isn’t as immersive as a book, with something always present, blinking and waiting? Feel free to discuss)
- Stick to your niche
- Put up markers to help readers identify what’s going on and where
- Write short, either by breaking up large chucks of text with pictures, quotes and videos, or breaking the text into more paragraphs – all to keep the reader’s attention
- Keep sentences short – 30 words or fewer is ideal
- Good posts generally consist of one strong idea that binds the post together – try not to cram too many ideas into the one post
Thinking of environment
This is practically as important as audience because blogging, as the video above demonstrates, is as much about a conversation with the internet as it is with readers. We are not writing in a vacuum; we are writing from the entire internet, and the world beyond.
- Links: use them. Posts can be expanded and strengthened by drawing in other sources or people who’ve already had this conversation, or research that’s relevant to the post
- More links: link to sources you have used in the post (to be taken seriously as a blogger and to avoid any plagiaristic grey areas)
- And on links: they need to make sense out of context of the post. This is why whale-dog 'here’ does not work as a link
- 'Here' is never a good link
This Jakob Nielsen article, Web usability: the top ten design mistakes, is a great post on what we’re doing wrong on blogs. Point four is devoted to links:
4. Links Don't Say Where They Go
Many weblog authors seem to think it's cool to write link anchors like: "some people think" or "there's more here and here." Remember one of the basics of the Web: Life is too short to click on an unknown. Tell people where they're going and what they'll find at the other end of the link.
Generally, you should provide predictive information in either the anchor text itself or the immediately surrounding words. You can also use a link titles for supplementary information that doesn't fit with your content. (To see a link title in action, mouse over the "link titles" link.)
A related mistake in this category is to use insider shorthand, such as using first names when you reference other writers or weblogs. Unless you're writing only for your friends, don't alienate new visitors by appearing to be part of a closed clique. The Web is not high school.
Thinking of interactivity
So if news is now a two-way street, readers have a right to respond, engage and challenge.
Comments are the thrill and bane of my blogging life. I am intrigued to learn what others think, while shocked that my job didn’t end with the blog post – I mean, I already said what I needed to in the post, what more is there left to say? (I should point out this is something I’m trying to improve upon.)
The idea of commenting is to introduce new material and ideas and to continue the discussion.
- Hear people and respond
- Admit when you’re wrong or reconsidering your position
- Post consistently so readers know when to stop by
- If comments aren’t working on your blog, consider introducing a comments policy or guidelines
(Incidentally, am I the last one to learn that CAPTCHA is an acronym for Completely Automated Public Turing Test to tell Computers and Humans Apart?)
So there is no fixed way to blog. But there are factors that need to be taken into consideration when writing for the internet in order to make it a collaborative writing/reading experience. If these writings are indistinguishable from our essays and novels, then we have failed to understand the medium.
Yet, as we writers are so often told, we learn the rules so we can break them. Who knows where that will lead in this digital frontier?
PS What do New Yorkers think about blogs?

(As my own blog is really just the "journal" kind, I'm commenting as a reader here.)
On the "stick to your niche" point I tend to disagree. Obviously, it is a valuable strategy in terms of SEO and, for some blogs, their "niche" is actually their purpose. But I don't think it is a critical element of a good blog or a good post. If the aim is for a large audience, or to recognised as an authority on the subject, or the first port of call, sure. But if we are just talking about audience loyalty, I think it is based on far more than just topic.
Even with niche blogs covering areas I'm interested in, the deciding factor (because it isn't like there is a dearth of choice within niches) will almost always be the "personality" of the content.
For all the rest, I agree, but on the bells and whistles point, I'd probably clarify a bit. When I was at the Misc Voices launch, because I had just come back online after more than a year away from the internet, another blogger asked me if I'd noticed any changes to the blogging scene and one of the positive changes I mentioned was "less bells and whistles". People had stripped away most of the baggage they had acquired while trying to "get noticed" or find their place. All the junk links and junk lists were gone. The bells and whistles are great, but should be used purposefully and judiciously.
Lani (cerebralmum)
21 April at 04:38PM
I think the points you make about writing for the screen by writing shorter posts, with shorter sentences and breaking it up into smaller paragraphs are highly relevant. I'm surprised by the amount of people who still proceed to write academic type essays online and that many in the debate about digital publishing think the screen doesn't come into account. I feel like I have repeated this point in other comments on other blogs too.
But on your point on writing for a niche, I am a bit confused. A niche is often a contested definition in terms of how broad or narrow your niche should be. For example, I interchange between writing about writing (writing, publishing, books, posting fiction) and politics - and often the two mix. Is this wrong? I do recognise that some readers only come for one of the topics.
Benjamin Solah
21 April at 05:00PM
I'm a bit tired of hearing this "112,000,000 blogs currently operating in the world" bollocks. I bet 111,000,000 of them posted once, then got bored. It would be more interesting if anyone could tell us how many blogs are still operating that have been going for more than a year with regular postings of more than, say, a couple of times a month. My sense of it is that a lot of the "might as well give this blogging thing a go" people have given up by now (though their hoary old postings from 2006 may still be online) and what is left are the people who are dedicated and have an audience.
nicko
21 April at 05:02PM
Nicko, I'd be interested in figures that talked about active ongoing blogs. I agree that the sensationalist figure of the blog is born every minute type doesn't get us far. Jacinda and I should have a go at trying to track more 'real' figures down - if they exist.
sophie
22 April at 01:22PM
Nicko and Sophie, I'd like to see such figures too, but they can be hard to track down. Technorati's 'annual state of the blogosphere report' is a good place to start, as is the University of Toronto's 'Blogscope' but where they both stumble is in identifying how many of the 112,000,000 blogs in existence are going concerns.
Nevertheless, Jacinda, I found this post extremely useful and have forwarded it on to my Web Journalism students. Nice work!
john weldon
23 April at 11:29AM
John, I am posting this again as the first one disappeared - if you have a web journalism class you might be interested in Paul Bradshaw's Online Journalism blog - he teaches at Birmingham City University.
Have left the link out as the Meanland blog doesn't seem to like them! Google him and I'm sure you'll find it, onlinejournalismblog.com
genevieve
25 April at 08:07PM
I appreciate the comments and feedback.
Lani, you could be right about the ‘niche’ purpose (and you’ve been blogging far longer than me). I guess it’s different if you have an established community of readers or writers. IMO, the ‘niche’ factor is a way of creating audience. And maybe ‘field’ is more apt – so if a writer is going to write about literature, readers know that their posts will always be about literature, either directly or indirectly regardless of the topic for the individual post.
And too true about the bells and whistles – purposefully and judiciously! I guess I was referring to the ‘potential’ of the medium rather than the ‘getting noticed’ factor.
Benjamin, I think this is a good question, and Lani’s points are really relevant here. Maybe if we think of writers being their own ‘niche’, then obviously you have yours: left-wing politics and writing (which I think includes the other categories you mentioned). I guess your difficulty is trying to find a way to interest your readers in both… (tricky).
Nicko, I hear you about the meaninglessness of the stat. As John says, the figures are hard to track down, which is why I borrowed from Nigel Featherstone. Though I’m not sure about the ‘dedicated audience’. I come across a lot of blogs just starting, as well as ones that have some history, yet many still seem to struggle for audiences and commenters.
John, thanks for the tips about where to start tracking down those stats. And thanks for the forward.
Jacinda
26 April at 01:22PM
Nice post, I am currently writing an article on this topic. If you do not have an objection I might borrow a snippet.
Aluminum composite materials
25 April at 11:49AM
I'm ipmsresed! You've managed the almost impossible.
Buff
08 May at 09:49AM
Great post. You never fail to write valuable articles that aren't just fluff. Keep it up...
I do agree with this excellent article. The blogs are in the heart of Google because this bot can believe in the frequent content changing ;)
Cheap SSL Certificate
12 July at 08:45PM
PING PING
asdaasdasd
03 September at 11:24PM